By Temitope Ojo
The controversy surrounding the zoning of the House of Representatives seat in Owo/Ose Federal Constituency has been cast in the light of political ambition. However, a deeper assessment shows it is, in fact, a question of fairness and balance within a shared political structure.
A dispassionate review of power distribution in the constituency since the return to democratic rule in 1999 reveals a recurring pattern. Owo Local Government has enjoyed a preponderance of political appointments and continues to occupy influential positions within the state’s governance framework. This dominance, while not unusual in politics, becomes contentious when it limits equitable participation by the other component of the constituency—Ose.
Stakeholders from Ose have therefore anchored their demand not on sentiment, but on the principle of inclusion. In a constituency defined by two major blocs, political stability is better sustained when power is consciously balanced. Where one side already holds considerable sway in executive and administrative spheres, it is only reasonable that the other retains representation in the legislative arm.
Failure to uphold this balance, observers warn, could deepen feelings of marginalisation and weaken trust among constituents. Inclusive representation remains a critical pillar for fostering unity and ensuring that all segments feel adequately carried along.
Beyond equity, there are political calculations to consider. Party strength at the grassroots level is often shaped by a sense of belonging and recognition. Ose has played a significant role in past electoral successes within the constituency. Overlooking it at a crucial moment of candidate selection may dampen morale and affect mobilisation efforts—an outcome political parties can ill afford in a competitive environment.
Continuity is another factor strengthening the argument. Effective representation goes beyond occupying a legislative seat; it involves building experience, strengthening institutional knowledge, and maintaining consistent engagement with constituents. Allowing Ose to consolidate its current hold on the seat could enhance legislative impact, while an abrupt shift may disrupt ongoing progress.
Importantly, this position does not seek to diminish Owo’s political standing or advocate permanent control of the seat by Ose. Rather, it underscores the need for proportional fairness in a constituency where both blocs have legitimate stakes. The principle of rotation, whether formalised or implied, can only endure when implemented with sincerity.
Ultimately, the long-term stability of Owo/Ose Federal Constituency lies in its ability to manage diversity through inclusion. Concentrated power often breeds discontent, while equitable distribution fosters cohesion. In this context, allowing Ose to retain the House of Representatives seat represents a pragmatic step towards strengthening unity and sustaining collective political progress.
0 Comments