Former England international and television personality, John Fashanu, has dismissed allegations made by his daughter, Amal, describing them as false and misleading.
Fashanu also disclosed that he had removed Amal from his company after accusing her of abusing a recent gesture aimed at reconciling the family.
The former footballer, in a statement made available to journalists, reacted to claims reportedly published by the Daily Mail, where Amal allegedly stated that she regularly visited him in Nigeria and managed aspects of his personal and professional affairs.
Fashanu denied the allegations, insisting that his daughter only visited him in Nigeria for the first time two weeks ago to introduce a man she described as her husband.
He also refuted claims that he had suffered brain injuries linked to heading footballs during his playing career, maintaining that he was in good health.
According to him, reports suggesting he had been married five times were inaccurate, stressing that he had only been married to three women and is currently with his wife, Vivian Fashanu.
The ex-footballer stated that Amal may have counted her mother among his former spouses despite the fact that he was never married to her.
Fashanu said his wife recently added Amal as a director and shareholder in his company in a bid to strengthen family ties, but alleged that the opportunity was later abused.
He further denied claims that Amal had acted as his agent in relation to television engagements, including “Dancing on Ice,” insisting that he had a trusted management team handling his affairs.
“Amal has never acted as my agent in relation to Dancing on Ice or any other professional matter, and she has not been managing my personal or professional affairs in any capacity,” he said.
The former Wimbledon striker added that he would maintain some distance from his daughter due to what he described as repeated violations of personal boundaries.
Fashanu also revealed that he was considering legal action against the Daily Mail over the publication, accusing the media organisation of failing to verify the allegations before going to press.
According to him, the publication caused him distress at a time he was already dealing with several legal disputes relating to land matters and other issues.
He, however, maintained that despite the disagreement, he still loved his daughter but believed keeping his distance was necessary for his peace of mind.
0 Comments